Government Information |
|
|
|
Reason For Independence |
Sao Hkun Hom
Foreign Minister
Dated: 17th April 2005
|
1 |
After 10 years of
trial period with Federated Union, Shan People have the option to
secede from the Union as from 1958. |
2 |
In 1959, Shan Rulers
from 34 states agreed to relinquish their |
| power back to Shan People
to honour the spirit of the 1947 Panglong Agreement and for the
preservation of the Federal Union |
3 |
In 174, a referendum
was held in Shan State by the Burmese Military Regime of Ne Win
to replace the 1947 Constitution by a new one. The Shan people were
tortured, arrested or killed for voting against it. The 1974 Constitution
was short-lived. |
4 |
Shan People had enough
of the atrocious Burmese Military rule for the past 43 years. |
5 |
Genuine Federal Proposals
were rejected four times by the Burmese Military Regime respectively
in 1962, 1993, 1996 and recently at the June 2004 National Convention. |
6 |
The SPDC's continued
refusal to participate in “Tripartite Dialogue” and eventual reconciliation. |
7 |
In more than 43 years
were have been waiting for the political reform for a genuine federal
Union , but that has not taken place. We think it never will for
following reason: |
(1) |
The hard line Burmese
nationalists believe that a Genuine Federation will break up the
union which is unfound and therefore they feel that they have to
hold on to power to stop the movement for a genuine federation. |
(2) |
The release of Daw
Aung Saan Suu Kyi is highly unlikely in the foreseeable future.
Even if she is released and with eventual tripartite Dialogue or
discussion taking place, it will not lead to reconciliation. This
is because the hard line military generals would still want complete
control over the government. |
(3) |
We cannot foresee
that Burma will return to a peaceful country in the near future
as we have seen for the last 43 years as well as recently. The assassination
attempt on Daw Aung Saan Suu Kyi at Depayin in May 2003 was an outright
conspiracy to suppress the movement for democratic reform and reconciliation.
The purge of Khin Nyunt demonstrates the intolerant nature and uncompromising
chauvinistic attitude of the hard line Burman to any form of co-operation.
They see everything as rivalry. This characteristic behavior is
typical of hard line Burmese now in the ruling military junta. |
(4) |
Shan State has had
the experience of being autonomous under separate administration
following British annexation nearly 50 years from about 1900 until
1948. During this period the Shans have been living peacefully in
harmony with other ethnic groups. We believe we can do it again. |
(5) |
Legally Shan State is independent based
on the abrogation of the 1947 Panglong Agreement and 1948 Constitution
and as stated in Section 2 of this constitution. |
(6) |
Shan State also qualifies to become a sovereign
states under UN Charters based on the following criteria: |
(1) |
Territorial integrity |
|
|
(2) |
Population |
|
|
(3) |
Language |
|
|
(4) |
History and Culture |
|
|
(5) |
Sustainable Economic |
|
|
(6) |
Shan Sate is a member of UNPO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|